|
Introductions
I guess I should introduce myself and tell you why I'm in
any way important to any plot.
Basically, I'm a disgruntled PhD student. I decided to take
a break from my PhD after I realized that if my days were
going to be spent answering to 4 bosses, being treated like
crap and being told to do as I'm told and not question authority,
then I should at least be paid a salary that puts me above
the poverty line.
I'm
90% sure that I'm leaving academia and running off to join
the evil world of large, money-making corporations.
And
I'm hoping to start writing in some futile attempt to get
enough experience to become a science writer.
My
plan is to make a wad of cash, become a science writer, interview
the twits who helped sabotage my career and expose them for
the small-minded dolts they really are.
That
is my plan for revenge.
That
isn't really going to happen, though. It's been just over
three months since my career tanked and I've already started
getting over it. By the time I make wads of cash and become
a science writer, I will most likely not be able to care less
about these people. In fact, I'll probably be thanking them
for having forced me to get out of academia and actually become
a useful member of society. Or I'll become an evil financial
analyst. Whichever.
At
this point you're probably wondering what happened to my doomed
academic career. Well, honestly, a lot of little things happened
and I was lazy. But my laziness was a natural reaction to
being treated like a thundering moron. My PhD supervisors,
both of them, because I went through two of them (seperately,
not co-supervised), felt that no one should contradict their
Royal Edicts. Any dissent was obviously due to inherent laziness
or stupidity.
(Before
I go on, I'd like to point out that both my Master's supervisors
were fantastic guys. We have great respect for one another,
both personally and professionally. The laziness and bad attitude
developed during my PhD.)
What
my PhD supervisors didn't understand was that sometimes grad
students are actually capable of independent thought. Sometimes
they can actually reason for themselves and come to different
conclusions than their supervisors -- without being stupid.
It
was pretty tough for my PhD supervisors to understand that
it wasn't always my fault that things didn't work. In fact,
it was so hard for one of them to accept that a piece of equipment
was broken, that he blamed me for not following his instructions
correctly. He was so upset with my performance that he asked
another student to do what he had originally asked me to do.
The other student hadn't been working with the busted equipment
for two years and didn't question my supervisor's authority.
Do I have to tell you that the other student didn't have much
more luck than I did?
Independent
thoughts are the last things you should have in grad school.
Forget all those lofty ideas about expanding your mind and
finding your voice and all that jazz, because being a PhD
student is like being a really badly paid corporate serf.
At least it's that way in Computer Science. You're expected
to work long hours, eat badly, never go on vacation, never
see your friends, and be excellent at five billion tasks,
all for the low, low salary of a burger-flipper at McDonalds.
(Actually, if you work the 80hrs/week minimum they expect
from you while taking no vacations, your salary actually comes
to less than minimum wage -- something like 5.50$/hr -- which
is a bargain-basement price for a highly-educated programmer.)
And
don't get me started on the micro-management!
One
day I complained to my last supervisor that I was rarely able
to get work done in the evenings. I liked having meals at
home at night to save money and relax. I would get home, cook
dinner, eat it with my partner (another poorly-paid grad student
with student loans coming out his wazoo), unwind (because
I was invariably stressed out of my mind by 6pm -- I wonder
why?) and then do some work. The problem was that our apartment
building had a roach problem and we had to thoroughly clean
the kitchen and dining room after we ate. The cleaning took
a while and we were often totally exhausted and unable to
continue working afterwards.
My
supervisor considered my story and then told me to move into
an apartment building that didn't have roaches. And of course
he knew that my salary was so very compatible with living
in Toronto in a vermin-free apartment -- not!
Another
time, I mentioned to him that I didn't have some programming
finished. I had changed the program slightly the previous
day and hadn't been able to fix all the bugs by the time I
got hungry and went home. I was going to finish it up in the
evening, but when I had gotten home I saw that I had run out
of clothes to wear the next day and would have to do laundry.
This included fine washables (i.e. bras and panties) that
needed to be hand-washed in cold water. I spent most of my
evening washing and never got around to fixing the bugs in
the program. I figured that was ok since this part of the
work wasn't really mission-critical and I would just finish
it up the next day.
My
supervisor looked at me like what I said was completely irrational
and told me that he had managed to do all his work the night
before and do three loads of laundry. He explained that all
his clothes were machine-washable. He told me that I should
buy only machine-washable clothes. Plus, as a grad student,
I shouldn't mind not washing (myself or my clothing) for a
few days in order to work.
But
I quibble because the micromanagement issues were dwarfed
by my nasty habit of questioning my supervisors when I thought
they were wrong.
The
biggest and last argument I had with my last PhD supervisor
was about math. I had disagreed with him about a mathematical
model he wanted me to implement. In lay terms, I felt that
his model could hardly be called a model because it was just
a hack that had worked for him once before. I told him that
the argument "it works because it works" may be
good enough for him, but I doubted it would be acceptable
at my thesis defense.
My
supervisor argued that I was totally being lazy and just didn't
feel like implementing his model -- a model that all his other
students had implemented without question.
If
I had been in industry, at least I could have moved laterally
in the organization, or I could have started looking for a
new job, using the experience from my old job as leverage.
But, as a grad student, all I could do was change supervisor
again or quit. And changing supervisor meant changing project,
so I'd have to start all over again.
I
was on my way to taking a leave of absence (with my supervisor's
blessing, by the way) to think about whether I wanted to tough
it out with this guy, change supervisor again or quit, when
my supervisor complained to the Powers That Be that I was
an utter slacker and informed them that he was dumping me
as a student.
Fortunately,
after a lot of drama and intrigue, I wasn't kicked out and
was allowed to take my leave of absence anyways.
That's
where I am now.
I'm
on leave of absence, looking for a nice, high-paying job and
writing. All in the hope of someday getting revenge by living
well -- and by writing a scathing piece about the small-minded
people who inhabit academia.
Sandra
"Snad" Polifroni is a disgruntled Computer Scientist
who's currently on leave from a PhD. She has a degree in Physics
which helps her make fun of "science" shows on cable
channels. Snad loves to complain and has been told that no
one complains as well as
she does. Snad's taken her love of complaining and created
an on-line journal chronicling her exciting adventures through
her PhD
and a page full of reviews of restaurants she's been to in
the GTA (and beyond!)
|